Who are you voting for next Novembe

[News] [FAQ] [Radio] [Chat V] [Search] - [Register] [Sign in]

Posting mode: Reply

You are browsing anonymously. Please sign in or register to post.
Most features are only available while signed in.
Why is free registration required to post?

Email
Password	[hide]
Reset my password

Browse threads by tag:

Entertainment	Anime Comics Movies Music Sports Traditional games Television Video games
General	Art Conspiracy History Instructional Literature Military Nature News Paranormal Philosophy Photography Politics Social Stories Trains
Lifestyle	Drugs Health & Fitness Food Nostalgia Spirituality Travel
Technical	.GIF & WebM Internet Programming Science .SWF (Flash) Technology Wallpapers
Pornography / Fetish	Feet Furry Gore Hentai Lolicon Men Pony Transgender Women
Around the world	International Canada Japan Mexico Russia United Kingdom U.S.A.
… and the rest	1chan.us Anonymous Random Request Roll

File: 1439276689221.png–(71.96KB, 1920x800, buscemi2.png) Tagged: U.S.A., Politics

wat 15/08/11(Tue)00:04:50 No.42854

Who are you voting for next November, fellow American patriots?

Sand Snatch Hillary "Campaigning Since Conception" Clinton?
Mememaster Bernie "Communist" Sanders?
Donald "As Seen on TV" Trump?
Marco "Look Guys! I'm One of You!" Rubio?
Jeb "Submit to the All Powerful Family" Bush?
Scott "Seriously Don't Fucking Vote For Scott Walker" Walker?

I'm all for Sanders right now, largely because everyone else is unbearable

※

Shimazu 15/08/13(Thu)16:59:09 No.42863

>>42854

Chief Keef definately

※

Anonymous 15/08/16(Sun)10:32:41 No.42869

as a wisconsinfag I can tell you the horror stories of scott walker, hopefully he keep running so he can resign from the governors office.

maybe sanders, I give him a 30% chance of getting the nomination. i'm probably going to write in my own name if not

※

cricken 15/08/17(Mon)19:07:32 No.42873

1439863651024.gif–(3.72MB, 581x327, 1426974671213.gif)

>>42854
people still vote?

※

wat 15/08/17(Mon)22:16:14 No.42875

>>42869
i've got some family up there, they were all so appalled when scotty boy won the first time, much less the second

>>42873
can't see why not. even if rupert murdoch and the illuminati are the ones controlling the elections, voting can't hurt. and since that's not definite, there's no reason not to if the elections really aren't rigged

※

Anonymous 15/08/18(Tue)10:46:21 No.42876

>voting

※

wat 15/08/18(Tue)13:46:36 No.42878

>>42876
>memeing smugly

※

Creed 15/08/18(Tue)18:09:34 No.42879

trump

※

Anonymous 15/08/21(Fri)20:23:57 No.42882

Rand or Rubio. Hillary is a reptile and Sanders is a commie.

※

wat 15/08/21(Fri)21:30:49 No.42883

>>42879
really or sarcastically? Trump is IMO the least viable candidate at this time

>>42882
they're all reptiles but Sanders is a socialist, not a commie

※

ethereality 15/08/23(Sun)16:29:52 No.42887

>>42854
Hillary
Just picking the lesser of the evils, at least she'll have bill "stinky pinky" Clinton behind her

※

Anonymous 15/09/18(Fri)17:26:25 No.42963

The lesser of the evils is obviously sanders. because he isn't evil and in his 35+ years of politics having never using a slander ad shows it very well right there.

※

Anonymous 15/10/06(Tue)17:46:05 No.42989

>>42883
Socialism is just a less radical and less violent form of communism. The USA needs to fix its nanny-state, and Bernie will only continue to enable that. 50& of all Americans don't pay taxes, and all of Bernies policies requires tax hikes.

※

Anonymous 15/10/07(Wed)06:04:00 No.42998

>>42989

Communism was never violent, it was all the dictator's power trips once they were in power. Lenin didn't order a genocide, but Mao and Stalin did. Communism would work if not for the selfish rationality of mankind.

※

Anonymous 15/10/11(Sun)00:34:04 No.43030

>>42998
Communism by definition is the forceful removal of property and capital from private entities. The so societies that have implemented communism in the past were brutal with class warfare. Killing people and putting them in prison because you want to forcefully redistribute their wealth is considered violent in my book.

[Return]